Financial analyst with over a decade of experience in commodity markets, specializing in gold and precious metals investments.
Authorities in Hong Kong have taken into custody 13 people on suspicion of involuntary manslaughter related to last week’s catastrophic blaze, amidst increasing criticism over the detentions of civilians calling for responsibility.
Rescue teams continued to search through the seven-building complex of the Wang Fuk Court estate in Tai Po on the start of the week, following the city’s deadliest fire in seven and a half decades. The death toll reached 151 and is expected to rise further as the search continues. Approximately forty people are currently unaccounted for.
The estate, home to nearly five thousand people, had been undergoing major refurbishment that have been linked to the origin of the blaze. In the wake of the tragedy, public fury has escalated over reported past safety violations by the construction company working at the location and lax enforcement of standards, spurred on by revelations that residents had been complaining about the renovations for a year.
On the afternoon of Monday, officials said the anti-graft agency had detained 13 people over the tragedy so far, including the executives and an technical advisor of a construction company, and had “immediately begun a thorough probe along the lines of involuntary manslaughter”.
A top administrator stated that seven of twenty tested samples of the mesh netting used around the towers did not meet fire-retardant standards. Initial testing had found samples were up to code, but the spokesperson said the cheaper, noncompliant material had been installed in areas hard to reach in order to evade detection, describing it as a “shameful act”.
“They just wanted to profit at the expense of human lives,” the official stated.
As allegations of safety violations grow, alongside reports that official bodies had issued several seemingly unenforced warnings, residents have questioned why no government figures have yet faced consequences. Instead, two members of the public were allegedly arrested by national security police.
A person, named as a Hong Kong student, was arrested over an online petition that made “four requests” for guaranteed support for the affected families and responsibility for those at to blame, including any corrupt or culpable public servants.
Local media said the student was detained for “seditious intention”. Law enforcement did not verify the detention, saying only that they “will take actions according to actual circumstances and in compliance with the law”.
Local media also reported the arrest of a former district councillor.
Asked about the arrests, the security chief said there had been “misleading statements online” that were intended to threaten national security. “Therefore, we must take necessary steps, including law enforcement measures,” the official told a media briefing. “Operational details cannot be disclosed as they involve national security.”
On local online platforms, people criticised the detention of citizens. “National security must be given precedence even if the dead are still trapped in the building,” said one.
Several users made parallels to the Chinese mainland. “There, these crimes are termed ‘picking quarrels and provoking trouble’,” said a user. “They are typically met with severe penalties. Stability overrides everything.”
A different user said: “Since we are aligning with the mainland’s methods, by targeting the individual who asks questions, nobody will venture to question, and therefore Hong Kong’s governance will have no problems.”
The detentions followed advisories by security officials that they would take action against anyone deemed to be using the tragedy to incite “hostile” feelings.
Before the arrests, authorities had already demonstrated heightened sensitivity to the community response. Since the quelling of earlier unrest, public assemblies have been tightly controlled. In the immediate aftermath, volunteer supporters quickly organized relief efforts, with many individuals employing vehicles and transit to deliver large quantities of clothes, food and other essentials for the survivors.
Nevertheless, by evening, armed police were patrolling the area, and public authorities eventually took over from the volunteer organisers.
The appeal over which the individual was allegedly detained was initiated on Friday evening. Its “four points” echoed the terminology of past campaigns but did not advocate political change.
The student informed media that he was only “putting forward very basic demands”.
“Should these suggestions are considered seditious or ‘crossing the line’, then I feel I can’t predict the outcomes of anything any more, and I can only do what I truly believe is right,” he said.
Financial analyst with over a decade of experience in commodity markets, specializing in gold and precious metals investments.